<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Publishing on Marketing Development</title>
    <link>https://mktgdev.com/tags/publishing/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Publishing on Marketing Development</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mktgdev.com/tags/publishing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Which Websites Survive AI Search and Which Ones Don&#39;t</title>
      <link>https://mktgdev.com/which-websites-survive-ai-search-and-which-ones-dont/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mktgdev.com/which-websites-survive-ai-search-and-which-ones-dont/</guid>
      <description>The sites that come through this intact all have one thing in common. They own something a language model can&amp;rsquo;t just restate. Everything else is downstream of that.&#xA;Start with the damage, because it&amp;rsquo;s worse than the averages suggest and it isn&amp;rsquo;t distributed evenly. Over roughly two years, small publishers lost about 60% of their search referrals. Mid-sized sites lost around 47%. The big ones lost 22%. Google Search page views across the web fell about a third in a single year.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
